to the satisfaction of most archaeologists. Clovis arrowheads are fluted (leaf like furrows in the central part of the base). I only understand that they have different weapons, but from what I've read, Fulsom are very similar to the Clovis people, just with a different name, at a later time, and existing in a different region. Regarding this, what is the difference between Folsom and Clovis points? One critical difference between Clovis and Folsom that investigators see in the archaeological record relates to lithic or stone tool technologies. Total number of reported Clovis Projectile Points (For an example type description, see Justice 1987:17-21) In most surveys, fluted projectile points are assumed to be Clovis and are represented here as 'Fluted' unless they are explicitly typed Clovis or some other variety is named, such as Folsom … Folsom and Dalton also contains flutes but with Clovis, the flutes are extended from the base up to about one third to halfway of the entire point. Clovis arrowheads are generally the largest when compared to Folsom and Dalton type of points. The Folsom hunted mammoth, and the Clovis hunted bison. And appearance, if any. Clovis points were replaced by Folsom points by around 10,000 years ago, so that, technically, the Clovis point culture had come and gone before the NaDenes arrived. A. Folsom is an archaeological dig site in New Mexico where the first Folsom point, a spear point, was found in 1927. The difference in the preferred toolstone use by Folsom can be attributed to … Chuck In my opinion the Barnes was a transitional point between Clovis and Cumberland that it morphed into the Cumberland, but from over 40 years of archaeological research, neither Cumberland nor Barnes points have been dated by absolute means (radiocarbon, etc.) B. Folsom points are often found with the bones of bison. Note the short, wide groove, or "flute," that extends a short way up the point from the base. Clovis projectile points are normally fluted, just like Folsom, but the flutes on Clovis are shorter and at an angle upward from the base (see figure four which demonstrates typical fluting angle differences). This difference between Folsom and Clovis described by Jennings (2015) also provides a possible explanation for the increasing redundancy of toolstone use by Folsom relative to Clovis. What are the more primary differences between the Clovis and Fulsom people, in terms of culture? The comparison between Clovis-bison and Folsom-bison points was significant for the first relative warp scores (p = 0.006) but not for the second relative warp scores (p = 0.181). The Folsom used wooden spear points, and the Clovis used stone ones. Clovis points are often found with the bones of mammoth. Which of the following statements best illustrates the difference between the Folsom and Clovis cultures? significant for the first relative warp scores (p ¼ 0.006) but not for Table 4 summarizes the results of the MANOVA. The of Clovis points differ from the Folsom-bison points, but do not comparison between Clovis-bison and Folsom-bison points was differ appreciably from each other. C. The Folsom were farmers, and the Clovis were hunter-gatherers. In this sense, the Clovis point culture could not be ancestral to all present-day Native Americans. We know that both Clovis and Folsom fluted their projectile points, but the fluting process for Folsom was more involved and intricate from that of Clovis.